Monday, December 2, 2019

MLB All-Decade Team (2010s)

It's hard to believe that in just a few weeks, the 2010s will have come to a close.

The span between 2010 and 2019 proved to be a great decade of baseball. It produced dozens of new stars, five World Series game 7's, a baseball dynasty from the Bay Area, and a tortured franchise finally breaking through and shattering a 108-year curse. The 2010s were good to baseball fans.

As we reach the end of one decade and prepare to turnover to the next, it's time to assemble the All-Decade team for the 2010s. I have carefully put together a team of players that I think best reflects excellence on the baseball field between the years 2010-2019, but not without one guiding rule.

If your best stretch of play came between the years 2005-2013, caught in between two decades, sorry  you're out of luck. In order to appear on the All-Decade team, you need to have played at least seven seasons between 2010-2019. That disqualifies storied veterans like Derek Jeter, who retired in the middle of the decade. That also disqualifies young stars that debuted midway through the decade. Oh well.

Here are my selections for the 2010s All-Decade Team.

Catcher: Buster Posey

Perfectly fitting to start the All-Decade Team, Posey's first full season in the big leagues came in 2010, when he won Rookie of the Year and helped the Giants win their first World Series in 56 years. Since, he's made six All-Star appearances, won an MVP, four Silver Sluggers, a Gold Glove, a batting title, and was the best position player on two other championship teams. In addition to the MVP that he won in 2012, Posey received MVP votes five other times. Despite his injury-shortened, mediocre 2019 campaign, he still boasts of a batting average of .302 on the decade. With my apologies to Yadier Molina, the best player on the team of the decade deserves a place on this roster.

Honorable mention: Yadier Molina

First Base: Joey Votto

In his third full season in the bigs in 2010, Votto took home the National League MVP hardware with an excellent campaign where he batted .324, logged a .424 OBP, 1.024 OPS, 37 homers and 113 RBI's. Since, the veteran has quietly continued to put up numbers in an often overlooked market in Cincinnati. Votto has finished top 3 in MVP voting three other times and top 7 in the award's voting six times. His 2017 campaign in my opinion should have warranted a second MVP. Nonetheless, Votto's six All-Star honors, 2011 Gold Glove and cumulative OBP of .428* (between 2010-19) make him a lock for the All-Decade team. At the start of the 2010s, this Canadian's career was just beginning to take off. A decade later, Votto's put together a resume worthy of the Hall of Fame.

*To put this into perspective, Christian Yelich's .429 OBP led the National League in the category in 2019. Votto essentially averaged Yelich's MVP-caliber OBP every year for a decade!

Honorable mentions: Paul Goldschmidt, Freddie Freeman

Second Base: Jose Altuve

Robinson Cano had just as much a case for this position as Altuve does. However, Cano got caught juicing, and juicers shouldn't make these kinds of lists (sorry; my list, my rules!). One of the great things about this sport is how its stars come in all shapes and sizes. Altuve is listed at 5-foot-6, which means he's really closer to 5-foot-4 or 5-3. Since his 2011 mid-season call-up, Altuve has brought home three batting titles, an MVP, six All-Star appearances, five Silver Sluggers and a Gold Glove. Altuve's also a lifetime .315 hitter. Even with a dark cloud hanging over the Houston Astros' organization, this Muggsy Bogues-sized star's remarkable start to his career deserves recognition.

Honorable mentions: Dustin Pedroia, DJ LeMahieu, Daniel Murphy

Dishonorable mention: Robinson Cano

Third Base: Adrian Beltre

At a crowded position where many stars have blossomed at (Josh Donaldson, Kris Bryant, Nolan Arenado, Manny Machado, etc.) in the 2010s, it was the eternally underrated Beltre whose resume shined brightest. After a disappointing stint in Seattle, Boston took a flyer on the former budding star that the Mariners had previously thrown $64 million at, offering him a one-year deal in 2010. Beltre returned to All-Star form, hitting .321 and finding himself in the MVP conversation once again.

Beltre's career is best comparable to that of future NBA Hall of Famer Steve Nash. Neither started to play their very best ball until they got into their early 30's, playing on the third team of their respective careers. That is when the late bloomers entered their prime and helped their teams become championship contenders. Following his resurgent 2010 campaign, Beltre signed with the Texas Rangers, where he became a staple of consistency for the organization. He batted .307, made five All-Star appearances, finished top 7 in MVP voting on four separate occasions, won three Gold Gloves and three Silver Sluggers all in his 30's between 2010-2018.

Honorable Mentions: Donaldson, Arenado, Machado

Shortstop: Brandon Crawford

Picking a shortstop for this list was perhaps my greatest challenge. The shortstop position has evolved so much since the beginning of the new millennium. Traditionally the position has been populated by mediocre hitters better known for their defense and ability to create 'web gems' on a nightly basis. But gone are the days of Baseball Tonight on ESPN (R.I.P. 1990-2017) and Major League Baseball teams expecting minimal offensive production from this position.

In addition to the position changing, the timeline for the league's shortstops just doesn't coincide as nicely with the 2010-2019 theme we have going as well as it does for other positions. The old guard of top-tier shortstops passed over to the new guard in the middle of the decade. The likes of Derek Jeter, Rafael Furcal, Jimmy Rollins and Placido Polanco were all out of baseball by the end of 2016. However, conveniently, that group has been replaced by a fresh batch of young stars at the position. There are eleven shortstops that have been brought up to the show no earlier than 2014, that have already played in an All-Star game.

As much as I wanted to pull the trigger and pick Franky Lindor, Trevor Story or Xander Boegarts, they just simply didn't have enough years logged in the 2010s to meet the proper criteria.

This left with me only a few viable options. After sifting through the numbers and weighing defense, I ultimately sided with Brandon Crawford. Crawford made two All-Star games, won three Gold Gloves and a Silver Slugger. His excellent defense and solid bat helped the Giants win the World Series in 2012 and 2014. I was tempted to pick Elvis Andrus, but ultimately sided with Crawford's championship defense.

Honorable mentions: Elvis Andrus, Andrelton Simmons

Left Field: Christian Yelich

Since his 2013 call-up, Christian Yelich hasn't wasted any time in the bigs. Even before transforming into the National League's version of Mike Trout in Milwaukee, Yeli was quietly putting up consistent numbers down in Miami. On the decade, he's hit .301 with a .383 OBP, posed as a great threat on the basepaths, won a Gold Glove, two batting titles, three Silver Sluggers, made two All-Star appearances, won an MVP in 2018, and was criminally robbed of an MVP in 2019.

Yelich ended the decade with more momentum than anyone, putting together a historically great two-year stretch between 2018-19, leading the National League in batting average, slugging percentage, OPS and OPS+ for two years straight.

Center Field: Mike Trout

He's Mike Trout; the player of the decade. Need I say more?

Right Field: Andrew McCutchen

Cutch started the decade as a Gold Glove center fielder and ended it as a full-time right fielder, so he qualifies for this spot.

Were you expecting Bryce Harper? While Harper may have emerged as the most recognizable brand name from the 2010s and the game's highest paid player, his track record doesn't quite measure up to that of others', such as Cutch's.

From 2012-2014, Cutch placed top three in MVP voting three years straight (2012-2014), winning the award in 2012 and finishing fifth in the voting again in 2015. By contrast, Harper has only finished top 10 in MVP voting once  the year he won it in 2015. Harper has only batted better than .275 twice in his career and has only hit more than 35 homers in a season twice. Harper has put together two fantastic years (2015 and 2017), but until he puts does it more frequently, he won't show up on lists like this one. He's displayed elite talent in the past, so maybe he will show up on my 2020s list ten years from now?

McCuthchen's a 5x All-Star, 4x Silver Slugger, Gold Glover and MVP.

Outfield honorable mention: Giancarlo Stanton, Jose Bautista

Outfield dishonorable mention: Ryan Braun

Designated Hitter: Miguel Cabrera

Tricked ya, didn't I? You thought I had forgotten about Miggy. Would you blame if I did? You would, but it seems Miggy's excellent career hasn't been talked about in recent years with his Tigers in no man's land, at the bottom of the atrocious AL Central.

Let me remind you real quick. Miggy took home two MVPs, four batting titles and a freaking Triple Crown(!) in the 2010s. He finished top 11 in MVP voting the first seven years of the decade! And despite a couple "down years" towards the end of the decade, he posted a cumulative .317 BA, .399 OBP and .943 OPS between 2010-2019. Miggy's played several positions over the course of his 17-year career, but has transitioned over to DH, where he looks to spend most of his time for the remainder of his career, qualifying him for this spot.

Starting Pitchers: Clayton Kershaw, Max Scherzer, Madison Bumgarner, Zack Greinke and Justin Verlander

This pitching staff wasn't too difficult to assemble. Kershaw easily posted the best regular season resume of any pitcher (8x All-Star, 2014 MVP, 3x Cy Young, 2013 pitching Triple Crown, 2013 Gold Glove) from the decade. He finished top 3 in Cy Young voting every year from 2011-2017, excluding 2016 - when he finished 5th. That season he had a 1.69 ERA. For some weird reason, everyone has seemed to have written him off, making claims that he's "over the hill" at the age of 31. He posted his highest career ERA of the decade in 2019 at 3.03  it was the only season of the decade where he didn't post a sub-3.00 ERA. The pitcher of the decade logged a cumulative 2.31 ERA and 0.96 WHIP in the 2010s.

Kershaw's postseason struggles have been somewhat overstated (remember when he shutdown the Cubs' at Wrigley in the 2016 NLCS?), but Madison Bumgarner's postseason success hasn't been. If Kershaw was the regular season pitcher of the decade, Mad-Bum was far and away the postseason pitcher of the decade. This southpaw beasted the Giants to their third championship in five years to the tune of a 0.43 ERA and 0.48 WHIP through 53.2 innings in the 2014 postseason. He hasn't received enough recognition for his regular season success, however. Bumgarner logged a sub-3.40 ERA for the first nine years of the decade (with a sub-3.00 four times) before hitting a career high 3.90 in 2019.

Max Scherzer's 2015 $210 million deal with the Nationals is on-pace to go down as the best $200+ million contract of all-time. Scherzer has somehow pitched his best in his 30s, after he left the Tigers midway through the decade. Dating back to his days in Detroit, he's finished top 5 in AL or NL Cy Young for the last eight years and counting. He's won the award three times, made seven All-Star appearances, and helped the Nationals win their first ever World Series.

Zack Greinke excelled in all six uniforms that he wore in the 2010, hopping from team-to-team and collecting five All-Star bids, six Gold Gloves, two Silver Sluggers and an ERA title. Cumulative ERA from 2010-2019: 3.18.

Verlander appeared to be past his peak in 2014 (4.54 ERA) before finding the fountain of youth in Houston a couple years later. He finished the decade off with his second Cy Young, adding to the 2011 MVP in his trophy case, right next to his trophy wife.

Honorable Mentions: Chris Sale, Corey Kluber

Closing Pitcher(s): Aroldis Chapman, Kenley Jansen and Craig Kimbrel

For the bullpen, I picked the three lights-out closers that sustained the most success over the course of the 2010s. Relievers have been known to come and go on a yearly basis, but Aroldis Chapman (6x All-Star), Kenley Jansen (3x All-Star) Craig Kimbrel (7x All-Star) have stood the test of time. Sure, Kimbrel didn't close out the decade as strong as he started it, but that doesn't take away from his excellence. Chapman was even able to shake off Joe Maddon's attempt to kill his arm forever in the 2016 playoffs. The flamethrower has pitched in the last two All-Star games donning the pinstripes.

Manager: Bruce Bochy

No other manager came close to achieving what Bochy did in the 2010s. Though the Giants' dynasty came to an abrupt ending following their 2016 NLDS exit (very similar to the Chicago Blackhawks' abrupt drop-off after their 2017 first round exit in the Stanley Cup playoffs), they left their mark as the team of the decade. The only other organization to win more than one World Series this decade was the Red Sox, and they did so using two different managers and front offices. Take a look at the Giants' rosters between 2010 and 2014. Neither team was the proverbial "super-team". No, the Giants (past Posey, Crawford and Bumgarner) for the most part, were a scrappy, wily group of veterans that understood timely hitting and not making costly mistakes. And they were led by the right man.

Honorable mention: Joe Girardi

Front Office: Los Angels Dodgers

While the NL West team from the Bay achieved the most postseason success in the 2010s, the NL West team from LA achieved more regular season success than any other team during this decade. President of baseball operations Andrew Friedman has put together a juggernaut in southern California since coming over from Tampa. The Dodgers will be entering 2020 with seven straight NL West division titles, a run reminiscent of the the Atlanta Braves, who took 11 straight NL East pennants from 1995-2005.

The key to the Dodgers' sustained success has been holding on to prospects (instead of using them as chips to go all-in) and plugging them into their system when the time is right. This has extended their championship window and put them in the mix every single year. The downside? The Dodgers have yet to strike gold and have no championships to show for it. We'll see what the next decade holds for them.

Honorable mention: Tampa Bay Rays

Dishonorable mention: Houston Astros


And with that, we have our 2010s All-Decade Team. Perhaps ten years from now, I'll be creating the 2020s All-Decade team, writing about the likes of Fernando Tatis Jr., Ronald Acuna Jr., and Juan Soto etching their names in baseball history. Whatever the new decade has in store for us on the baseball diamond, I'll be here for it.


Follow me on Twitter @JackVitaShow.

Wednesday, July 10, 2019

Podcast: 7.5.19 MLB All-Star Picks + London Series + What is Going On with the Cubs and Phillies?


Jordan Morandini returns to the podcast to share his All-Star picks (0:00 - 28:35), talk All-Star game rules + stakes (28:35 - 36:00), London Series (36:00 - 45:10), Cubs' June woes (45:10 - 1:15:25), Phillies' struggles (1:15:25 - 1:25:00), potential second half shockers (1:25:00 - 1:30:00), Home Run Derby (1:32:15 - END), and plenty more!



Tweet us your thoughts!
Jordan: @RealJMorandini
Jack: @TheJackVita


Download this episode.

(Image via CBS Sports)

Thursday, June 27, 2019

Podcast: 6.23.19 NBA Finals Wrap-Up, NBA Trades + Draft, and MLB Talk with Connor Boehm


Connor Boehm makes his podcasting debut to talk about takeaways from the NBA Finals (0:00 - 22:05), the Lakers acquiring Anthony Davis (22:05 - 35:50), the NBA Draft (35:50 - 49:20) and news from around the MLB (49:20 - 1:12:45).



Tweet Jack your thoughts!
Jack's Twitter: @TheJackVita

Subscribe to the podcast on iTunes! And you'll never miss an episode. You can also follow "Press On Sports" on Spotify, subscribe to the podcast YouTube channel, or subscribe on whatever platform you get your podcasts on.




Download this episode.

(Photo via CBS Sports)

Podcast: Jimmy Neutron: Boy Genius (2001) with Barry Dunn


In a special bonus episode, Barry Dunn visits the podcast to talk about one of his favorite childhood movies, Jimmy Neutron: Boy Genius with Jack! Together they discuss everything from alien abduction, a lawless society run by children, Jimmy's inventions, wacky friends and of course, Hugh Neutron!



Tweet Jack your thoughts!
Jack's Twitter: @TheJackVita

Subscribe to the podcast on iTunes! And you'll never miss an episode. You can also follow "Press On Sports" on Spotify, subscribe to the podcast YouTube channel, or subscribe on whatever platform you get your podcasts on.



Download link: https://pressonsports.podbean.com/mf/play/eqnqw5/POS_6_5_19_Jimmy_Neutron_FINAL.mp3

(Photo via Paramount Pictures)

Tuesday, June 4, 2019

Podcast: NBA Finals Game 2 Reactions + MLB Talk with Bair Kothmann


Bair Kothmann makes his podcasting debut to talk about takeaways from the first two games of the 2019 Finals (0:00 - 43:25). Does Toronto have hope? How will they bounce back from their game 2 loss? What can the Warriors expect from Klay and Durant? Then, Bair and Jack discuss the latest news in Major League Baseball (43:25 - 1:13:35), including Cubs-Cardinals, Phillies-Dodgers, AL West teams, the emergence of Lucas Giolito, and much, much more!
 

Tweet us your thoughts!
Bair's twitter: @Bairkothmann21

Jack's twitter: @TheJackVita

Subscribe to the podcast on iTunes! And you'll never miss an episode. You can also follow "Press On Sports" on Spotify, subscribe to the podcast YouTube channel, or subscribe on whatever platform you get your podcasts on.




(Photo via NBA.com)

Monday, May 27, 2019

Podcast: Bachelorette Premiere, Amazing Race, Survivor and SNL with Rachel Gerhardt


Rachel Gerhardt visits the podcast for a 'reality TV hour' to talk about the first two episodes of The Bachelorette (13:30 - 36:50), the new season of The Amazing Race (36:50 - 49:45), the finale of The Challenge (49:45 - 58:35), and the controversial Survivor finale (58:35 - 1:10:40). But first, she and Jack share some thoughts on Adam Sandler hosting SNL and his wonderful Chris Farley tribute (0:00 - 13:30).



Tweet Jack your thoughts!
Jack's twitter: @TheJackVita

Subscribe to the podcast on iTunes! And you'll never miss an episode. You can also follow "Press On Sports" on Spotify, subscribe to the podcast YouTube channel, or subscribe on whatever platform you get your podcasts on.



Download link: 
https://pressonsports.podbean.com/mf/play/dhbwzh/POS_5_24_Reality_TV_Rachel.mp3

(Photo via ABC)

Tuesday, May 21, 2019

Podcast: MLB Season Preview


Jordan Morandini and Jack make their (one month-late) MLB division + World Series picks, as Jack returns to the podcast for the first time from surgery.



Tweet us your thoughts!
Jordan: @RealJMorandini
Jack: @TheJackVita

Subscribe to the podcast on iTunes! And you'll never miss an episode. You can also follow "Press On Sports" on Spotify, subscribe to the podcast YouTube channel, or subscribe on whatever platform you get your podcasts on.







Download podcast: https://pressonsports.podbean.com/mf/play/wnw8js/Press_On_Sports_Baseball_Preview_5_8_19_FINAL_DRAFT.mp3

(Photo via Tampa Bay Times)

Saturday, February 9, 2019

Trusting God When My Plans Fail


How often have you heard somebody say that they "trust God", only to see that their actions don't quite match this philosophy?

Instead of turning to prayer when they hit a rough patch, they turn to money, alcohol, Netflix, ice cream, social media and other worldly pleasures in order to self-medicate their anxiety, pain or uncertainty.

It's easy to say "in God we trust", but much more difficult to put this philosophy into practice when we need to. For me, the time to trust God whole-heartedly without wavering is now.

Tuesday I will be undergoing thyroid removal surgery in order to treat an overactive thyroid condition called "Grave's disease". Graves' has greatly impacted my life for the last two and a half years. It complicated my senior year of college and has kept me from pursuing a full-time job following graduation. None of this was in my plans.

Since I was diagnosed in September 2016, I have been on a medication called "PTU" to treat the disease. My hope had always been that after enough time of taking PTU had passed, the disease would go into remission, as it does in about 50% of patients. Once again, the plan I had sketched out for myself in my head failed. The medication has helped, but it hasn't eliminated the disease from my life, and even if the disease were to go into remission through this form of treatment, it can always come back.

My plan B, one that I had previously dreaded, has become a reality. The surgery that will take place next week will remove my thyroid entirely, and I will live the rest of my life without a gland that is essential to our bodies. In its place, I will receive synthetic thyroid hormone tablets that will perform the necessary functions; I'll take these each day for the rest of my life.

If I'm being honest, the idea of surgery has scared me for quite some time. What if something goes wrong when the surgeon creates the incision in my throat area, and I experience a permanent hoarseness in my voice as a result? Or worse, what if my vocal cords are accidentally damaged to the point where I can no longer speak? Both dangers have less than a 1% chance of taking shape, but that .01% is enough to scare anybody that records podcasts regularly and is pursuing a career in various forms of journalism.

What if there are long-term risks and dangers of living on the supplemental hormones, or living without a thyroid?

By undergoing the surgery, I am putting my life in the hands of somebody else. The moment I realized this is the same moment I realized that I like being in control. I like being safe. I don't like putting my fate in someone else's hands. So for me, this surgery is a true measure of faith.

As a born-again Christian, I've constantly preached the message of "trust God." As Christians, it's ingrained in our heads, but is it ingrained in our hearts, as it should be? Is trusting God our first reaction when things fall out of our control?

As I pose these questions, I want to look at some scripture. Proverbs 16, verses 1-9 are filled with rich wisdom on this subject. For the sake of time, I'm going to shorten this passage to just a few verses.

1 The plans of the heart belong to man,
    but the answer of the tongue is from the Lord.
2 All the ways of a man are pure in his own eyes,
    but the Lord weighs the spirit.

Fast-forward to verse 9...

9 The heart of man plans his way,
    but the Lord establishes his steps.

Throughout the entire Bible, God tells us not to fear, and that His ways are higher than our ways (Isaiah 55:8-9). In this instance in Proverbs, it is spelled out that though we as humans want to establish our own plans, God's sovereignty reigns supreme. Oftentimes the goals we set pale in comparison to the wonder that God has in store for us, whether it be here on Earth, or within the eternity that awaits us.

My plan to get over this disease may have sounded great to me. But what if the disease had gone into remission, only to return and knock me back to square one in a couple of years? What if that were to happen at a much less convenient time in my life, keeping me from accepting a dream job offer? What if the surgery is an inevitability and my best bet is to face it head-on, so that I can finally be free to move on with life?

The bottom line is that sometimes the way we envision things to work out is different from the way God knows they would actually work out. As the protective Father that He is, He keeps us from harm. He overrules us sometimes and His plan proves to be far greater than what we had envisioned.

In the book of Jonah, God physically corrects the direction of Jonah's voyage. Jonah wanted to be safe, and God wanted Jonah to preach the gospel to one of the world's most hostile cities. Had Jonah been able to continue on his own path, one of the greatest revivals in the history of the world would never have taken place.

Trusting God isn't always safe; in fact it's often dangerous and can sometimes put us at risk. But it is always good. There's great comfort and peace in knowing that God is on the throne.

So here I am, just days away from surgery, taking a risk and doing my best to fully trust God. At least it didn't require three days in the belly of a whale to get me here.


Follow me on Twitter @TheJackVita.

(Image via http://allofus.info/2018/10/aslan-and-your-calling/, quote in the image from C.S. Lewis' The Lion, The Witch, and the Wardrobe)

Thursday, January 31, 2019

America Should Appreciate Its Patriots


After Tom Brady engineered both game-tying and game-winning drives in last week's AFC Championship game, it was inevitable that the quarterback and his team's greatness would once again be cheapened by the general public.

At age 41, Brady racked up 348 yards through the air, in sub-20 degree temperature en route to a road victory in one of the toughest places to play in all of sports, Arrowhead Stadium. It was perhaps his finest playoff performance and accomplishment in a non-Super Bowl. How could we miss this?

Wait. We did. Instead of admiring and attempting to make sense of the all-time great's newest wonder, the conversation dominating social media and talk radio revolved around the NFL's overtime rules.

Current rules allow for each team to get a touch of the ball in overtime IF the first team to start with the ball doesn't score a touchdown. It's a tremendous improvement from the previous rules that would allow the first team with possession to win on a long field goal. In those circumstances, a kick returner could break off a nice return, and all it might take for a win is a pair of first downs and a 50-yard kick.

No, with today's rules, if you lose the coin toss and have to start OT on defense, there's plenty of hope for you. All you need to do is keep your opponent from moving 75 yards down the field and into the end zone. Hold your opponent to a field goal, and you'll get the ball with a chance to win the game.

The Chiefs' defense was well aware of this, and the stakes were very clear: get a stop, and you're in the Super Bowl. They failed.

Had the roles been reversed in this case, do you actually think this would become a topic the media would have hotly debated all week? If the Chiefs started OT with the ball, and America's sweetheart Patrick Mahomes led his team down the field for the game-winning six, would we actually care that the Patriots didn't get a chance on offense?

I don't think we would.

Because of their dominance, America looks at the Patriots differently than it looks at every other team. For the last 19 years, football fans have attempted to diminish their success any way they can. Spygate. Deflategate. The tuck rule. "Cheatriots" has become a popular (and unclever) Twitter diss from the haters.

On their way to building one of the greatest empires in sports history, the Patriots have left a trail of broken hearts, crushing the hopes and dreams of fans of teams across the NFL landscape. Since the start of the new millennium, they've ended the seasons of 16 different NFL franchises. That's half of the league.

Chances are, if you're reading this, the Patriots are your own personal Regina George (they're life-ruiners - they ruin people's lives!), without the nastiness, and your team has been victimized by their reign at one point or another. My Steelers have lost three separate AFC Championships to New England (2001, 2004 and 2017), so I never thought I'd one day be writing an article telling football fans that the Patriots are not worth the hate, and that we should instead be grateful for what the Patriots have brought to football, yet here we are.

I'm not going to attempt to protect other teams and athletes from hate. The Yankees have more money than any other Major League team. NBA super-teams like the Warriors and formerly the Miami Heat, have been built upon two or three star players opting not to compete against each other, and instead to join up and bully everybody else. This has created a significant competitive imbalance in the NBA, one that may be hurting the league's viewership. Some teams that are hated play the game dirtily or kick their opponents when they're down. Not the Patriots.

Despite what you might think, the Patriots are one of the least dirty teams in the NFL. Year in and year out, they're consistently one of the least penalized teams. No, that isn't because they are 'helped by the refs'; they are one of the most disciplined teams that refuses to push the boundaries of play on the field. The Patriots don't dare the refs to blow the whistle as other teams might; teams that commit borderline defensive or offensive holding nearly every play, because in actuality, if a penalty is assessed on every play, the game would become unwatchable. The Patriots don't draft players that commit dumb, late or cheap penalties. The organization has never been linked to bounties. Their players rarely engage in smack talk; in fact, that is the opposite of the Belichick way.

Belichick is despised by fans and media members alike because of his crusty, un-warm persona. In press conferences, he's not a zany character and he doesn't provide much information to the press. He's often compared to the the evil emperor Palpatine in Star Wars. But when Gregg Popovich does the same? He's treated as a media darling.

Unlike the NBA and MLB teams mentioned, the Patriots are on an equal playing field with their counterparts. The construction of the sport disallows a team to become dominant by virtue of three players. The NFL's hard cap puts every team on an equal playing field, and the NFL makes it even more difficult to sustain success because first place teams play first place schedules.

Let me be clear: I'm not asking you to root for the Patriots in the Super Bowl. You're probably tired of them. You want to see something new, and that's understandable. You want to see a new story and see other players get their first taste of a championship. I get that.

What I am asking of you is to not allow your distaste towards the Patriots taint the lens you see the game through with an unhealthy and irrational bias because so far. I'm asking you to be thankful for what the Patriots have brought to the sport, because whether you like it or not, the Patriots have been good for football.

Whether the Patriots win or lose, they generally deliver ratings and exciting games. Last week's AFC Championship scored 53.9 million viewers. There is a big difference between the Patriots' dominance and the Warriors' dominance. The NBA Finals has had the same two teams playing in them for the last four years. This would be acceptable if the games were compelling. For the most part however, the Warriors' owned the Cavaliers 15-7 through the four series combined. Even the highly touted 2016 series that the Cavs won in 7 only featured one game decided by single-digits. The Patriots on the other hand, have produced very tight games in all of their Super Bowl appearances.

Since the start of the 2000 NFL season, there have been 18 Super Bowls played. The Patriots have played in eight of those games, and all eight have been extremely close, one-score games. If you were to rank the ten best Super Bowl games from between 2000-now, you'd probably have all eight of those Pats games in the top 10. Here's what my top 10 would (roughly) look like:

1) Super Bowl 42- Giants 17, Patriots 14 (Tyree catch)
2) Super Bowl 51- Patriots 34, Falcons 28 (28-3 comeback)
3) Super Bowl 49- Patriots 28, Seahawks 24 (Butler pick)
4) Super Bowl 43- Steelers 27, Cardinals 23 (Santonio Holmes catch)
5) Super Bowl 46- Giants 21, Patriots 17 (Manningham catch)
6) Super Bowl 36- Patriots 20, Rams 17 (Brady's first Super Bowl-winning drive)
7) Super Bowl 52- Eagles 41, Patriots 33 (Nick Foles!)
8) Super Bowl 38- Patriots 32, Panthers 29
9) Super Bowl 39- Patriots 24, Eagles 21
10) Super Bowl 47- Ravens 34, 49ers 31

Outside of the top 10 that I've listed, there's only been one other one-score game (Super Bowl 45; Packers 31, Steelers 25) during this stretch, a game that is easily interchangeable with no. 10 on our list. Almost every Patriots Super Bowl has had a defining moment that will stick in our minds for the rest of time. The Tyree catch. The Butler pick. The Manningham catch. The 28-3 comeback/Edelman catch. The Vinatieri kick vs. the greatest show on turf.

I honestly had completely forgotten that the difference in the Ravens-9ers game was just a field goal. The defining moment in that game? The power outage. Even some of the close games we've had that haven't featured the Patriots haven't been very memorable.

Out of the ten Super Bowls this millennium that haven't featured the Patriots, only three have been one-score games. The others? Well, they haven't been particularly pretty. Here are a few samples:

Super Bowl 50- Broncos 24, Panthers 10
Super Bowl 48- Seahawks 43, Broncos 8
Super Bowl 41- Colts 29, Rex Grossman 17
Super Bowl 40- Steelers 21, Seahawks 10
Super Bowl 37 (Gruden Bowl)- Buccaneers 48, Raiders 21
Super Bowl 35- Ravens 34, Giants 7

As much as you may say that you hate watching the Patriots, would you honestly choose to watch a replay of one of these lopsided games over one of the Brady classics? You probably wouldn't. At least I hope you wouldn't.

We are watching one of sports' greatest movies before our eyes. Depending on how you see it, it may be a drama, it may be a comedy, it may be a thriller, or it may be a horror film  but do yourself a favor and don't leave the theater until the credits roll. Because once it's over, you likely won't see anything like it again.

I have no idea who is going to win Super Bowl 53, but I can almost certainly bank on one thing: the Patriots will once again deliver a classic.


Follow me on Twitter @TheJackVita.
(Image via Boston.com)

Friday, January 25, 2019

Podcast: Conference Championships, Bachelor and Celebrity Big Brother Talk with Rachel Gerhardt


Rachel Gerhardt stops by the podcast to talk about NFL officiating and overtime rules, the Conference Championship games from the previous weekend, Cubs Convention, The Bachelor, and Celebrity Big Brother.



YouTube version:

Tweet Jack your thoughts!
Jack's twitter: @TheJackVita

Subscribe to the podcast on iTunes! And you'll never miss an episode. You can also follow "Press On Sports" on Spotify, subscribe to the podcast YouTube channel, or subscribe on whatever platform you get your podcasts on.

https://pressonsports.podbean.com/mf/play/fsxbds/Press_On_Sports_1_25_Rachel_G.mp3
(Photo via USA Today)

Thursday, January 24, 2019

Two Players Hall of Fame Voters May Have Overlooked


I'm not going to waste your time debating the Hall of Fame cases of former baseball players that have had their names linked to PED use since their playing days.

Every argument that could be made for or against the Cooperstown enshrinement of the likes of Barry Bonds, Roger Clemens and company has already been made somewhere. The topic has been tirelessly debated for the last 15-20 years, long before the release of the 2007 Mitchell Report and the book Game of Shadows was released to shelves in 2006. Chances are, you've already formed your opinion on this subject and it cannot be swayed, and that's fine.

But has the annual discussion revolving around these polarizing figures prevented us from looking closer at the Hall of Fame cases from other fringe HOF'ers?

This year, two terrific players from the 2000s hit the ballot for the first time. Neither received more than 5 votes and both are now off the ballot moving forward.

Should they both have gotten in on the first ballot? Probably not. But the careers of Lance Berkman and Roy Oswalt should at least warrant some future consideration. We've seen many players start on the ballot with a low vote percentage, only to gain momentum over the years and make a push towards the top as baseball writers look closer at their careers.

Let's start with Roy Oswalt.

Listed at 6-foot-0 (but could have likely been 5-9 or 5-10), this right-hander was often perceived as undersized and wasn't picked until the 23rd round of the 1996 draft out of junior college. He burst onto the Major League scene at 23 years-old in 2001, going 14-3 in his rookie campaign with a 2.73 ERA and 1.06 WHIP.


In his first ten seasons (2001-2010), he was about as dominant as any starting pitcher from his era. He posted a sub-3 ERA in five separate seasons, and only had one season with an ERA higher than 3.55. He was top 6 in Cy Young voting on six different occasions. With the Astros, Oswalt delivered several gritty playoff performances, including two starts in the 2005 NLCS where he held a 100-win Cardinals team to just two runs and eight hits over 14 innings, which propelled the Astros to their first ever World Series appearance and earned him NLCS MVP honors.

A string of injuries began to derail Oswalt's career in his mid-30s, and by 2014 he had retired from baseball. Oswalt exited the game with 163 wins and a lifetime ERA of 3.36, two points lower than the career ERA of first ballot HOF'er Roy Halladay.

Oswalt was likely penalized because his career did not contain the same longevity that his counterparts' did. Soon to be inducted Halladay and Mike Mussina stuck around for 16 and 18 years respectively. Halladay was an obvious first ballot choice; a one of a kind pitcher that won two Cy Youngs, threw a perfect game, and delivered a no-hitter in a playoff game. Mussina, however, gradually rose from 20% from his first year on the ballot to just over the needed 75% five years later. If given the same opportunity, Oswalt could have experienced a similar jump over time.

Berkman's case is even more interesting. As pointed out by the Twitter user @RGBIII, Berkman and 2019 Hall of Fame class member Edgar Martinez's career numbers aren't very far off from each other.

In addition to what @RGBIII notes, both players had a .400+ career OBP. Martinez was a seven-time All-Star; Berkman garnered six All-Star selections. Berkman was top 5 in MVP voting four times. Martinez was only finished top 10 in MVP votes twice. Berkman was even the best position player on a team that reached the World Series, and later won a World Series as a key piece for the Cardinals (batting .301 on the season with 31 homers and 94 RBI's).

Martinez received 85.4% of the vote. Berkman received 1.2%.

The distinct difference between Berkman and Martinez is that Berkman played a defensive position, while Martinez had the luxury of DH-ing for over half his career. The status of designated hitter has stained the resumes of several prospective Hall of Famers in the past for the reason that designated hitters are perceived to hold an advantage over non DHs. The threat of injury in the field is entirely eliminated, and they can't be subjected to criticism from the public for weaknesses in the field. That player is never going to be in a situation where a ball can roll through his legs and cost his team the game. DH's are able to play longer into their careers due to their role not being as physically demanding. Martinez's career is very unique because his batting average, OBP., SLG, and OPS all went up in the second half of his career (when he became a full-time DH) from the first half (when he primarily played in the field). Both parts of his career were very strong, however.

For me, personally, I've never had a big issue with DH's making the Hall, but the baseball writers have. So to see an 85% gap between these two players was startling to say the least.

To be clear, I am in no way saying that Berkman was better than Martinez, and that one should be in the Hall and the other shouldn't. What I don't understand however is what exactly the baseball writers are looking for, because sometimes the voting patterns are inconsistent. Given the statistics and evidence that we have, you would not expect there to be that big of a perspective gap between two excellent players. Unfortunately for Berkman, there is.

Perhaps Berkman was hurt by the fact that even in his heyday, he was overshadowed by other stars at his position, some in bigger markets. In the late 2000's, the NL Central boasted of an outstanding crop of first baseman, including Berkman, Albert Pujols, Prince Fielder, Derrek Lee and Joey Votto.

Perhaps Oswalt and Berkman were victims of playing in a smaller market in Houston. Bigger market teams like the Yankees, Red Sox and Dodgers typically receive more attention, and typically play on prime-time more often than teams like Cincinnati and San Diego.

Whatever the reason was, I wish the voters had taken a closer look at Oswalt and Berkman. Perhaps the Veterans Committee will someday.


Follow me on Twitter @TheJackVita.
(Images via Baseball-Reference and Houston Chronicle)

Friday, January 4, 2019

Podcast: 2018-19 NFL Playoff Preview with Jordan Morandini


Jack and Jordan get you set for NFL playoff action, discuss what went wrong for the Steelers and Vikings and where the Vikings can go from here. Jack weighs on a disappointing year from the Steelers. Then, they break down all of the first round matchups, make NFL awards picks, talk fun Super Bowl locations, and look ahead at potential playoff matchups and dark horses.



YouTube version:


Tweet us your thoughts!
Jordan: @RealJMorandini
Jack: @TheJackVita

Subscribe to the podcast on iTunes! And you'll never miss an episode. You can also follow "Press On Sports" on Spotify, subscribe to the podcast YouTube channel, or subscribe on whatever platform you get your podcasts on.





Download link: https://pressonsports.podbean.com/mf/play/hzxpnn/POS_NFL_Playoff_Preview_2019.mp3

(Photo via USA Today)